Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T-Bull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

T-Bull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and comes off as promotional for the company rather than just an article. GamerPro64 00:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Only a few sources mention the company, and only in the context of press releases and game reviews. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH.- MrX 00:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  01:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  01:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  01:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  01:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I see no obvious signs of better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 04:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, no refs, fails WP:NCOMPANY. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Why speedy deletion process? There's no speedy deletion for lack of refs or not being notable. Appable (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Originally proposed deletion as "Unsourced, no significant coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search". Nothing appears to have changed. czar 04:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom and Czar. -- ferret (talk) 21:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy. I did a quick google search for Polish language sources and seem to have found some, but I'm not sure of their quality. Here are some articles: [1][2][3][4]. this article was published in Gazeta Wyborcza, one of the most read newspapers in Poland. In the mean time in case the article does get axed I'd like to take a better look at the sources and see if the article can be improved.--Prisencolin (talk) 07:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.