Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T10 Sports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T10 Sports (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Article needs more independent and reliable sources that provides clear evidence of notability. — A.A Prinon  ^Conversation 10:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — A.A Prinon  ^Conversation 10:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. — A.A Prinon  ^Conversation 10:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — A.A Prinon  ^Conversation 10:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — A.A Prinon  ^Conversation 10:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems to pass GNG at a cursory glance.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not 100% on the guidelines for a clothing company, but if it's GNG it seems to fail as there is no real coverage of the company apart from official sites or companies/teams they supply too. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Google news shows lot's of news on this one. I think the article and citations just need to be improved. Webmaster862 (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Webmaster862, every thing you search on Google news shows much news at a soft look. But you must understand through which news, the subject has received significant coverage to pass WP:GNG. Google News just provide news of a topic you search if there is at least one word mentioned in a site. Most of the news of Google News about T10 Sports are just match predictions or live streaming etc, so not enough to pass WP:GNG. — A.A Prinon  ^{Leave a dialogue} 12:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Webmaster862, I understand that you are experienced than me in terms of date joined. But having only 196 main space edits, I don't think that you have well understanding of these complicated Wikipedia policies about notability. So, you should first of all do some research and go through the project pages explaining the guidelines. — A.A Prinon  ^{Leave a dialogue} 12:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did a bit of digging. while you are right that some of these may not be related or are just a mention, these articles have good in-depth coverage aninews.in, khaleejtimes.com, InsideSport. I will stick to my vote. Webmaster862 (talk) 23:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my research I discovered that they run "Abu Dhabi T10" which is a very popular cricket tournament. I have gone ahead and added a section about this and expanded the article with new sources. You should do a fresh review and search Google for "Abu Dhabi T10." There are dozens of in-depth articles about it such as this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webmaster862 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Webmaster862, take a read of WP:NCORP and especially the WP:ORGIND section - all three of those links rely entirely on Announcements from the company, fails ORGIND, no Independent Content. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Coverage is limited to PR pieces (press releases or their rewrites) or mentions in passing. Fails NORG/GNG IMHO. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per HighKing. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - only routine coverage found, nothing satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.