Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T2 infosec conference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

T2 infosec conference

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing why we need this article. It's largely directory-like. Most of the sourcing is primary. It seems like a run-of-the-mill annual conference that doesn't particularly need an encyclopedia article. Marquardtika (talk) 21:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as not notable and organizational advertisement. It is a two day conference of which there are approximately "1.8M conventions, conferences, congresses, trade shows and exhibitions, incentive events and corporate/business meetings" each year so how many should we include on Wikipedia? To refbomb an article with a lot of primary sources to present notability is actually counter to several policies and guidelines. Otr500 (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NN, plenty of refs which are in finnish or primary, i had to watch some of the presentations on youtube to get an idea of the reach, there are probably 100 people in the room watching presentations on information security. Szzuk (talk) 17:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.