Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNTlite (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TNTlite

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article that has existed since 2005 about non-notable software that has failed in that time to provide any references showing how this topic meets the criteria for notability. -- Longhair\^talk 08:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE non-notable product with no substantial references. Article has had just two human edits in the 12 years since 2009.--10mmsocket (talk) 14:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect: This and the related TNTmips article were created by an IP WP:SPA. The 2005 AfD seems to have fallen into a WP:ITSUSEFUL discussion. Although there are passing mentions that this cut-down version of TNTmips exists, I am not seeing evidence that it has in itself gained notability. If the main product survives its parallel AfD, then a redirect may be valid, otherwise deletion seems the appropriate outcome. AllyD (talk) 15:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This isn't my content area, but I am seeing hits in google books on this topic which may or may not constitute significant coverage. Have reviewers looked at what is there?4meter4 (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. There are passing reference to this subject in book references but I have not found anything substantial. Ifnord (talk) 01:24, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.