Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TPI Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TPI Sound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not an obviously notable PA / speaker manufacturer. I turned down a CSD A7 because these sort of companies supply to large scale popular events or artists, and hence become notable by that means (eg: Carlsbro, Mackie, Watkins Electric Music), but I can't find any decent sources for this one at all. A complete blank in Sound on Sound (watch out, TPI is a well-used acronym so there are lots of false positives!) is a major red flag. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Clearly nothing to suggest assume better, WP:TNT at best. SwisterTwister talk 04:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Run-of-the-mill regional PA provider who builds their own boxes from 40 year old designs. I probably would have hit this one with the db-spam template myself if I'd seen it first. Being a service provider of a notable event doesn't make a company notable unless the company themselves have been featured in write-ups and/or behind the scenes documentaries. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 18:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Can't find any good coverage that would satisfy the WP:CORP requirements. /wiae /tlk 23:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.