Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tadimety Aromatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:15, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tadimety Aromatics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:RS and is written as WP:PROMOTION. It has not been substantially improved since its creation in 2012 by an editor who appears to have had a WP:COI and has made no other contributions to Wikipedia. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Indian media searches find routine listings but not the independent coverage required to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 17:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - surprised that this has lasted so long! Almost zero coverage; barely even passing mentions in secondary sources let alone SIGCOV Spiderone 23:09, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete :Fails GNG surely. Dont know how this lasted so much Indianfootball98 (talk) 03:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.