Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajimul Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Randykitty (talk) 17:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tajimul Islam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be deleted per WP:CRIMINAL, article is solely about alleged crimes. Fram (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Egregious WP:BLP violation among other things. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Crime, India, and West Bengal. Fram (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per WP:PERP, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for being accused of crimes — he would have to be convicted of a crime before that became possible grounds for an article, and even then the crime would still have to be of enduring significance in some way that would pass the "will people still care about this ten years from now" test. We're writing history here, not news. But the article, as written, fails to state that he ever held any office that would hand him a free pass over WP:NPOL, so it can't be kept just because the article calls him a politician either. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:NPOL. The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. RangersRus (talk) 21:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete— Agree with the nominator, should be deleted per WP:CRIMINAL, and it also fails the WP:NPOL criteria.EmilyR34 (talk) 04:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.