Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Me, I'm Yours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. No support for deletion. Owen× ☎ 14:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Take Me, I'm Yours (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable- ref 1 and is just plot/sypnosis, and ref 3 is about an actor and how is joining the show, and not about the show. And I wasn't able to find sources for notability with google. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I have no opinion about the current article, but please restore the redirect to Take Me I'm Yours rather than deleting. --Zundark (talk) 10:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Easy to find coverage just by searching in Japanese, such as [1] [2] [3] Iostn (talk) 10:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Adumbrativus (talk) 10:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• The Japanese article ja:私をもらって frames it a little better as originally a Korean web novel and webtoon "날 가져요", so it's worth looking around for Korean source material. Here's some coverage which is less than deep but more than trivial: Yonhap News Agency, on it being made into a Japanese TV show, [4]; Korea Herald, similar along with some other webtoons also mentioned, [5]; Chosun Ilbo, on it and other web novels and sexually suggestive content, [6]. Adumbrativus (talk) 10:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Japanese and Korean coverage identified above seems to show this could be considered notable enough; thanks. And as another contributor says, a redirect seems warranted, so opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 12:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per @Iostn‘s sources, and others readily available in Japanese. Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.