Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanishq Sharma (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tanishq Sharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NMODEL. Ueutyi (talk) 07:50, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The only sources mentioned in the references are self-created or social media references without any weight age. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.70.114.122 (talk) 18:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No reliable sources either. Yintan 07:52, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oman-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I originally created the first AFD, then immediately withdrew it when I realized that, in this case, WP:BLPROD (The BLP article doesn't cite any sources.) may be a better choice. Seems the article's author won't let the tag stay put, though, so here we are. I've also reported the username as promotional and implying use by more than one person. -- Gestrid (talk) 18:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- an unreferenced BLP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.