Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taproot (fork)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of bitcoin forks. Sandstein 07:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taproot (fork) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Additionally, article is about proposed/possible event so WP:CRYSTALBALL issues violate WP:NOT (proposed Bitcoin forks in the past have been rejected). Those issues aside, still should not be a standalone article as it appears to be a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of information that should be listed/merged into the already created List of bitcoin forks article. Hocus00 (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge with List of bitcoin forks. I don't understand the SIGCOV argument, I think there is significant coverage from CNBC, Bloomberg, and Forbes. But the CRYSTAL argument is fair, I don't oppose merging with list of bitcoin forks and then spinning back out into its own article in November. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to History of bitcoin#2021 it's a thing, but not important enough to be a stand-alone page, and (fork) is not the right disambiguation term. History of bitcoin is a very low-quality article; putting this content there will improve that article. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:53, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with List of bitcoin forks. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 03:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per 力 - David Gerard (talk) 09:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge With list of bitcoin forks, subject not notable enough for a standalone article.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.