Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Bashir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 03:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tariq Bashir

Tariq Bashir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage found. Fails WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 07:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a little hard to judge fairly because it's written as a plain promo CV (grr...), but I gather the main claim to notability is being Senior Research Officer on Pakistan's science advisory council. I don't believe that sufficies for WP:NACADEMICS. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Bashir, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.