Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Bhat (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tariq Bhat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-promo article about non-notable film director, the sources cited are either syndicated content based on PR blurb, or else discuss other topics and mention him only in passing, and a search finds nothing beyond social media accounts and directory listings. This has quite a chequered past incl. earlier speedy, so AfD seems needed at this point. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO / WP:FILMMAKER. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete CSD would also have worked. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Just for the record, I don't think it would have, given the history; but all the same, here we are. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- I believe screenwriter of an apparently notable film is a credible claim of significance. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Just for the record, I don't think it would have, given the history; but all the same, here we are. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Lacks independent coverage. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. Fails GNG and ANYBIO. Kolma8 (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.