Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Farooq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - TheMagnificentist 12:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tariq Farooq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable badminton player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as he is a winner of the tournament so he passes WP:NBADMINTON. Greenbörg (talk) 05:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as he satisfies the criteria according to WP:NBADMINTON. Fredmorcos (talk) 07:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Greenbörg. Mar4d (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is absolutely no GNG at all so this person is not-notable at all. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's GNG at WP:GNG, you should read it. What does "absolutely no GNG at all" mean - are you claiming that there are no sources mentioning this person at all anywhere in the internet/in print, because that isn't true, or are you saying that you have assessed the sources and they don't quite meet WP:GNG? --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable badminton player, meets GNG per WP:NBADMINTON. Florentyna (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NBADMINTON. Stvbastian (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.