Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Rasool Rather

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tariq Rasool Rather (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Google Scholar returns five papers, only two of which seem to have been cited by others. These two have been cited 2 and 34 times, respectively; compare this to a random academic, Yangnam Gu, who has produced at least four times the output, averaging around 40 citations per paper. This person is not widely cited. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 07:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Does not meet WP:PROF. Gusfriend (talk) 08:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Assistant professors are usually WP:TOOSOON for academic notability and the citation counts in his Google Scholar profile do not suggest an exception in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.