Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taskwise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taskwise

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company fails notability standards. Daylen (talk) 16:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG poorly sourced to blogs and press releases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theroadislong (talk • contribs) 16:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Probably could go with speedy as there are virtually no sources out there, especially nothing in-depth. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.