Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tata Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 18:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tata Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary sources only, notability not established by the references.   Bfpage |leave a message  12:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Significant coverage in India media plus very notable company. However the page and citations needs to be improved. Some citations found by me: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Mr RD 16:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article needs work but the notability of a ~1.3 billion dollar Tata group company that, as Mr RD points out, has received considerable media coverage is not really in doubt. (see this and this for news coverage about its financial and tech. activities respectively) Abecedare (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is the story, MrRD? Those links are all going to the same page. Awaiting you response before I decide on this one. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• BeenAroundAWhile, I've put in different links, please try finding them through wiki script if you can not go to them directly. Also you can search for citations here, this is the custom search engine for the purpose of Indian news articles (as many of them do not get indexed by Google. Cheers, Mr RD 12:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Those links are all going to the same page. Not for me (except for Mr RD and I having listed one link in common). Could you check your computer/phone and try again? Abecedare (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Tata is one of the prominent groups in India. Despite of the poor quality of it, this article is very notable. A quick search shows some significant coverage: [5] [6] [7] [8]. Easily passes WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. — Yash! ^(Y) 21:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is a big multinational company. Even if the internet presence is not huge is it clearly significant. Mtpaley (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - appears to be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.