Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teabox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teabox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable private. Significant RS coverage not found; sourcing is in passing, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Kiranhota with no other contributions outside this topic; then edited by SPAs such as Special:Contributions/Samvit1 and others. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Press-releases, no sources found. Largely promotional. Oaktree b (talk) 02:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, India, and West Bengal. Shellwood (talk) 06:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not available.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete May pass WP:GNG seems to have enough WP:SIGCOV. Article is written like a promotional ad, needs some WP:NPOV GoldMiner24 ^Talk 02:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GoldMiner24, you say "Delete" but the rationale you provided looks like it is a vote to Keep this article and improve it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're right, I realize my comment is pretty confusing. I was on the fence on this one. Let me change my comment. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 18:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete There is some coverage of the article's subject but I think it fails WP:GNG. If kept, the article could definitely be improved as it feels like a promotion for the company. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 18:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete : Article subject is a Too Soon. --Gabriel^t@lk 00:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.