Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechJuice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TechJuice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

cited sources are self-published. seems like WP:Advertising Saqib (talk) 06:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Fails WP:NOTADVERTISING non-notable blog fails WP:GNG - GretLomborg (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I see a lot of primary sources/press releases, but not much secondary source coverage. May just be too soon. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 07:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now. Fails WP:GNG. Written like advertisement. Greenbörg (talk) 09:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 11:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.