Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techiman Senior High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The keep arguments are too weak for me to close this as Keep, but there's clearly not consensus to delete. RL0919 (talk) 06:21, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Techiman Senior High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Coverage consists mainly of various persons peripherally connected to the school. Coverage does not discuss the topic in detail. Steve Quinn (talk) 02:56, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - It's clear no-one is disputing the existence of this school. Keeping its location in mind, we should keep this. The end of Google is not the same place as the end of the world, and we'd keep this article on a high school if it were in Britain or the states. Perhaps we should notify the appropriate country Wikiproject. John from Idegon (talk) 18:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per John from Idegon and time-honoured precedent as evidenced by thousands of AfD closures. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Both keep votes are invalid since WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES itself is not valid since 2017, so there is not inherent notability for high school. No opinion on the school yet but this should not be closed as keep. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep precedent aside, the school's existence and notability are corroborated by the reliable sources and sustained, comprehensive coverage in reliable secondary sources. 208.185.237.210 (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.