Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology company - Imposed Fines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Technology company - Imposed Fines

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to be an article. Ran it through CSD but did not have a suitable reason. Decliner suggested AfD. A loose noose (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete This is not an article. Reywas92^Talk 20:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I tried that, and DGG rejected it and told me to bring it to AfD. Which seems kinda weird to me, too, but there you have it. A loose necktie (talk) 01:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

if in any doubt, I suggest bringing it here. I've done that since I started 12 years ago; I was so advised by experienced editors then, and I so advise others. Even if it's deleted speedy at the afd, at least one additional person will have looked at it. DGG ( talk ) 15:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Okay, but didn't the "experienced" editors back then have less than two years of "experience" under their belts? And now that at least three of us have looked at it, can't we just speedy it as a non-article?) A loose necktie (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as a combination of IAR and A7. But it can be closed now anyway. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 03:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A table is also an article, see the featured list Periodic table (detailed cells). This is also a notable topic, see [1], [2]. wumbolo ^^^ 08:56, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TNT case. Poorly formed title and content. Listing only a single small fine? Britishfinance (talk) 09:56, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.