Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted and the Angel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ted and the Angel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television program which aired only in one market; fails WP:TVSHOW. I should also mention I can't find any evidence of an Emmy nomination on IMDb, emmys.com or chicagoemmyonline.org, but maybe it's in a specialized category. Blackguard 07:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - NN local TV show. Article created by COI. reddogsix (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If the Ted Weber article survives AfD, this article's content can be used to improve that one. I could find only one online RS mention of this show, a passing reference in a book about kids' TV shows in Chicago. [1] There doesn't seem to be enough coverage of this show for it to warrant its own article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/situational selective merge: At the rate this is going it is quite possible that the article on Ted Weber will be deleted due to lack of notability issues but if it does survive then I'd suggest a selective merge as said above, so long as we can find some adequate sources. --The one that forgot (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely unsourced, and judging by a Google search, completely unsourceable. --Michig (talk) 09:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.