Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeeQueue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TeeQueue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a musician whose only discernible claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC is that he and his music exist. There's no indication of reliable source coverage here either, as the "referencing" is entirely to blogs and self-published promotional content like his own YouTube channel and his single's sales page on iTunes and a PR bio on a user-generated profile site where any musician can add themselves. And, in fact, apart from the division into section headers this article is virtually identical to that user-generated public relations profile, though the user-generated issue makes it impossible for us to verify whether this is a copyvio or whether they were both copy-pasted by the same creator. I would ordinarily have speedied this for lacking a credible claim of notability, but this is a followup recreation after the first version was speedied for lacking a credible claim of notability -- so we need wider discussion and possibly some WP:SALT. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which a person becomes entitled to maintain an advertorially toned repost of his own publicity materials just because he exists. Bearcat (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. A google search of the subject doesn't show an ounce of coverage. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 02:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable person. - TheMagnificentist 18:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I find it hard to say that the article contains a credible claim of significance and would also have tagged it with {{db-person}}, however it makes sense to run a full 7-days AfD on this so we perhaps get a {{db-repost}} possibility in the future. If I cna count, Bearcat, the current incarnation is not just the second, it's (at least) the third: deleted under A7 as Tee Queue on 2 February. "Tee Queue" returns more hits than "TeeQueue", still the artiste currently fails GNG/BASIC as well as MUSICBIO. Generous SALTING of both titles is suggested. — Sam Sailor 20:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay, I didn't know about that one. SALT is definitely warranted, then. Bearcat (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable WP:Musicians.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.