Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror threat analytics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:21, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Terror threat analytics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The phrase does not appear to be notable and is a neologism. This article, which has no properly formed references, appears to be intended either to popularize a neologism or to promote a team or a "burgeoning field of research". Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete It reads like a corporate press release, and searching fails to find any significant reference to the term. Seyasirt (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:NEO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it clearly is written by a "beltway bandit" (yes, was surprised we have an article on that idea!) trying to promote this to the US government. W Nowicki (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.