Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Matlen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Matlen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Makes unverifiable claims about the subject's notability and regard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.188.244.1 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor--above text is copied from article talk page. I remain neutral on the nomination itself at this time, but I will note that the article appears to have started as an autobiography. --Finngall ^talk 02:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete total lack of independent sources needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is unsourced with some ext. links to her website and some related sites. No independent RSes used or found in searching. Fails GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Gab4gab (talk) 18:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely lacks sources other than subject's own websites and fails GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFAA:1DC0:B8AF:FB81:7059:9CD7 (talk) 18:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability per WP: GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.