Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teta Colamonaco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teta Colamonaco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, fails WP:NARTIST JMHamo (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per WP:BAND (and merge any cited info) to Screaming Tea Party. Sources[1][2][3].--Jahaza (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Article is written by an WP:SPA and largely promotional with very weak sources. I don't think redirecting is helpful. She left the band, so there's not likely to be anything noteworthy happening with regards to her as a member. She seems to want to establish herself as an artist, but fails WP:Artist at the moment. The vogue reference is to an open submission portfolio site, the refernce to the collaboration with Maguire is based on what looks like a press release. I can't find anything about her as a painter. There is one interview with her in the Italian vanity fair. Mduvekot (talk) 19:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete instead as the band article is also currently at AfD, nothing here suggest a better solid notable article. SwisterTwister talk 23:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to establish notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.