Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetraapeirogonal tiling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tetraapeirogonal tiling

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not notable. As with the now deleted pentaapeirogonal tiling, this tiling is not mentioned of this tiling in the cited sources. Searching for the name yields next to nothing, although it may go by another name in reliable sources. As it stands, the article appears to be entirely original research. AquitaneHungerForce (talk) 23:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 00:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another polytope article failing WP:NEO and being pure WP:OR and trivial statements. I think at this point, you can use WP:PROD and any similar articles on hyperbolic semiregular tilings. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree that the same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentaapeirogonal tiling apply. Adumbrativus (talk) 02:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triapeirogonal tiling and before. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No doubt this and the other pages mentioned above are less harmful than other types of material we have floating around, but the fact remains that Wikipedia is not a fandom wiki for polytopes and tilings. (If someone wants to start that wiki, hey, more power to you, and I mean that sincerely; it's just not what Wikipedia is for.) XOR'easter (talk) 21:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the citations were copied verbatim from other hyperbolic plane tiling articles. I doubt this tiling is even mentioned there. Regardless, this isn't remotely notable. Owen× ☎ 00:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.