Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texephyr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Texephyr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an unsourced advertisement. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 14:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I have found that this nominator has AfDed 9 Articles, 7 PRODs and 6 CSDs. of articles in a particular Category:Technical festivals in India I strongly believe WP:BEFORE was not done despite being clearly advised to so on Helpdesk. --DBigXrayᗙ 12:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I found several sources with significant coverage. Whether they are reliable, I can't tell. Bearian (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Agree with Bearian, sources are available to make it notable, passes WP:GNG. Rocky 734 (talk) 08:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I consider the sources routine notices and not independent. DGG ( talk ) 10:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.