Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textile Today
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Textile Today
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Textile Today (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent Reliable sources in the article which can establish notability of this article. Other sources provided (besides the subject's own website) in the article are only talking about a conference/seminar (a press release) organised by the subject of this article. ~ Nahid Talk 18:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, not notable magazine. Kayser Ahmad (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per Nahid, No notability --SalmanZ (talk) 12:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Fails Wikipedia:COMPANY___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.