Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texting Base, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Texting Base, Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web company. Sources are a blog, a primary source interview, press releases, the company website (and even that fails to support the statement where cited). Searches found nothing better, nothing that even begins to meet WP:CORP. Worldbruce (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as newly founded company with unlikely enough solid coverage for a solidly notable company article. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article loaded into mainspace after being rejected 4 times at AfC. As per the advice from the AfC reviewers, "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability", nor can better be located. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.