Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Guy with the Glasses (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Channel Awesome. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That Guy with the Glasses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why was this article recreated? I thought it was merged into Channel Awesome. Was there something that warranted splitting it up from that article? Restore the Redirect AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC), update 22:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinging Bueller 007, Spike Wilbury who discussed the merge as well as Kkj11210 who restored the article after it was redirected. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Channel Awesome, Protect Redirect. Given how TGWTG fully became Channel Awesome (eg no splintering groups), there's no reason to have this as a separate article and in fact some of these content should be provided as a history of the Channel Awesome page. --MASEM (t) 18:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Not a delete, but a very obvious merge/redirect. Bueller 007 (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see anything to merge that wasn't merged already. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Channel Awesome. We have a lengthy section about this there. I also looked at the sources and they seemed strenuous because the majority were mentioning Channel Awesome first, sidelining our subject. Mr. Magoo (talk) 00:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Channel Awesome per Mr. Magoo and McBarker's comments. Aoba47 (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, protect redirect per Masem. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 13:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - per Masem (and salt too.) Sergecross73 msg me 20:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.