Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheOrder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TheOrder

TheOrder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a production team. Notability is not inherited. Fails WP:GNG.- MrX 19:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC) - MrX 19:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creator has a clear COI; look at their name and userpage. Origamite\(·_·\)(/·_·)/ 23:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No significant coverage. Origamite\(·_·\)(/·_·)/ 23:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I would say that if they were responible for producing multiple hit records, and met WP:GNG, they would be notable. The problem isn't "inheriting" notability, it's meeting GNG, and there just isn't anything out there about this group as a group, and precious little on the individual members (I found one brief article on Soko being credited for Drunk In Love, on the Nehanda Radio blog [1]). The WP article for Drunk in Love does list them (by name, not as TheOrder) in the credits, and the one for Nothing Was the Same credits "Proctor" (no first name, neither of the others) on a few tracks. So they were probably involved, though not necessarily as TheOrder, and the article may be pooling individual activities of group members. Not to mention that without reliable sources talking about their contributions, we can't tell how important they were to the production (the article could very easily be overstating it). As a side note, User:TheOrderMusic is a clear violation of WP:GROUPNAME and should probably be blocked for such once this AfD is over. — Gwalla | Talk 21:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheOrder, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.