Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Architect's Essence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:26, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Architect's Essence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable book (WP:NBOOK). Google search returns some hits, most of the Facebook pages [1]. No reliable sources of any kind. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:21, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As written, fails WP:GNG. Unreferenced, too. This kind of stuff belongs on a wikia, not here. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. According to the author's twitter page, it doesn't seem that this series has even been published yet. I'll warn the editor in question about COI editing, as it appears that he's also the author himself. There's just nothing out there to show that this book is notable enough to merit an entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he is the author if the book, and the book has not yet been published. He admitted that at my talk page [2]. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.