Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bottom Line (radio programme)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Evan Davis#BBC. MBisanz ^talk 18:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bottom Line (radio programme)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. One could maybe argue that it passes WP:RPRGM because it was on BBC, but the SNG also states that "the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone." I nominated it for a merge into the host's article, but honestly I'm not exactly sure what would be merged as there currently are no sources and very little prose. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:MILL, not a drive time (the radio equivalent of prime time) show. Bearian (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable BBC multi-format programme with a global audience; I've added a few references Piecesofuk (talk) 16:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Out of the recently added sources the Independent.co.uk source is clearly the most in depth. I would argue the others are borderline trivial mentions or not independent in the case of the OpenLearn source. Generally more than one source is used to determine notability, and personally I would want to see how in depth the Financial Times article is before making that judgment. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Evan Davis#BBC. Fails WP:RPRGM per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 01:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.