Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hamilton College Spectator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Hamilton College (New York). -- RoySmith (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Hamilton College Spectator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student newspapers are not notable JDDJS (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Merge into Hamilton College (New York), doesn't meet WP:GNG on its own, but useful to the other article. - SanAnMan (talk) 19:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ��� Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge as mentioned as this is not seriously needed for deletion but it is also still questionable for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per WP:CHEAP and common sense. Bearian (talk) 19:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree with the above that notability requirements have not been met. WP:CHEAP doesn't talk about merges; cheap disk space is not a reason to keep information. In this case, I kind of go along with the WP:MERGEWHAT essay. Unless someone is volunteering to merge the info now, it doesn't seem worth the pain. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.