Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Insanity Machine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Austin_Mardon#Bibliography. Consensus that a separate article is not warranted and the redirect is reasonable. Davewild (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Insanity Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published book without unrelated citation or review. Does not meet WP:NBOOK. Tgeairn (talk) 03:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikimandia: Judging by your recent humorous comments recently, I'm assuming moving to Fox News is a joke? I simply want to make sure for the closing user. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: All signs point to yes on that :-) МандичкаYO 😜 16:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Austin Mardon#Bibliography - Whether or not Austin Mardon is notable, I'm not sure but it's the only one with the nearby link, my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing to suggest this book has received even the slightest attention. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Insanity Machine, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.