Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Old Man and the Three

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to JJ Redick. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 22:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Old Man and the Three (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was previously deleted via CSD G11. About two weeks later, It was recreated by the original author. Although the new version of the article appears to be slightly less promotional, I'm still not seeing the notability. Virtually no sourcing outside of the 3 already in the article. Source 1 is just their website, the NYT source seems fine, but the WSJ source (which is behind a paywall for anyone who wants to read it) seems to talk more about another NBA player's podcast that is hosted by their company than this particular podcast. Fails WP:WEB. 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - There have been two New Yorker stories about his podcasting--I don't remember how detailed the Hua Hsu one was, as I read it months ago, but the 2017 story about Redick's first podcast is accessible via Google search. Caro7200 (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I don't know about straight-up deletion here, it seems like this should definitely be worth a redirect to JJ Redick, at the very least. Ejgreen77 (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, I think a redirect would probably be more useful.--🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 23:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Old Man and the Three, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.