Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Overload
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE due to lack of participation in the discussion. Article re-creation available at WP:REFUND. Joyous! | Talk 14:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- The Overload (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Article about a radio show, referenced exclusively to its own self-published website about itself with no evidence of reliable source coverage shown at all. As always, a radio show is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it exists; RS coverage supporting a proper claim of notability per WP:NMEDIA is required for an article to become earned, but nothing like that has been shown here. Bearcat (talk) 22:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.