Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Serra Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Serra Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was dePRODed by an IP user without addressing the issues. The PROD was endorsed by a second experienced user. Concern was: Most of the cited sources are dead links, or not directly about the subject, but that besides, the article does little to to demonstrate that the organisation is significant or important, and hence fails WP:ORG, and is promotional. Notabillity is not inherited from celebrity collaborators or supporters. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the PROD endorser per the PROD rationale. This firm doesn't have the depth of coverage we expect under WP:ORG. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. non-notable organization, with trivial references and extensive name-dropping, by declared promotional editor. DGG ( talk ) 14:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per aboveLight2021 (talk) 19:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.