Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theonym (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Theonym

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF. Furthermore, the only source is a dictionary definition. Online results are also mostly dictionaries. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- article cited entirely to the definition of the term. No other sources have been presented at this AfD. No prejudice to recreation if someone is willing to do it with reliable sources. Delete for now as not adding value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing at all for its own convincing article considering what's only listed is the general information of what it means. SwisterTwister talk 02:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.