Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thepetebox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (discuss) @ 21:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thepetebox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:NMUSIC. No WP:RS sources presented in article, and I can't find any that satisfy notability by searching. (Please note that the original version of the article was full of puffery and promotion - I've removed a lot) Thrub (talk) 08:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I guess "He won the 2005 BBC Radio 1 Beatbox Championships, and was named as a winner of the year's Channel 4 Talent Awards." might be enough for WP:NMUSIC? But it would need reliable sources to verify. Thrub (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There's a Sunday Sun article on HighBeam that confirms the Radio 1 Beatbox Champion statement, also a few more articles there, and several more found from a Google search. One would expect to find most coverage on Google News archive in this case, and while that's down it's difficult to know how much coverage there is. I think there is probably enough. --Michig (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 00:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.