Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thieves and Villains

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 05:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thieves and Villains (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find evidence of this band meeting WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Also, per this discussion. Vanamonde (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 21:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 21:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Two albums on Victory Records plus some reasonable coverage ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]), just about satisfies WP:NMUSIC. --Michig (talk) 10:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as has multiple reliable sources coverage such as Paste magazine, Allmusic, the aquarian and others, also has two albums released on a notable label, passes WP:GNG, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on sources found by Michig (thanks!). I'm not certain they are good secondary sources, but they appear to be, so I will give them the benefit of the doubt. --David Tornheim (talk) 03:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.