Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Party Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third Party Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the sources are either to non-RS like IMDB, non-WP:INDEPENDENT like the company's own website, or - in the two cases of RS and independent sources - are reviews of one film the company produced. A BEFORE search fails to find anything about the company, as opposed to information about its films (and even then only a smattering). Chetsford (talk) 17:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 18:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 18:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The IMDb references and the company website reference have been removed and the article has been reviewed for objectivity. Most production companies are mentioned in relation to their films, therefore articles about the films mentioning the production company are logical to draw information from. The production company has had multiple films in Sundance and on HBO, and therefore deserves a Wikipedia page, though the article does need continuing work. Fall109 (talk) 20:47, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As per nom. Notability is not inherited and while some of the movies or people involved may be notable in their own right, there is no indication that this company meets the criteria for notability. References are mentions-in-passing and fail WP:SIGCOV. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:56, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep per User:Falll09. Redditaddict69 02:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Refs don't discuss the company, they discuss the films, promotional. Szzuk (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.