Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Fuchs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Fuchs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish that this meets WP:Notability (people) or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't. Delete. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—No claim to notability, not sufficient coverage in WP:RS. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable individual lacking significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.