Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Groome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. czar ⨹ 05:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Groome

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability WP:BIO. Tagged as such since Aug 2012. Ifnord (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant independent coverage.131.118.229.17 (talk) 21:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think it was fairly easy to find independent coverage of Groome. His opinions on papal matters seem to be pretty widely quoted. He may be best known as an author. I've added a couple of reviews to one of his books as a start. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 08:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very impressive Google Scholar results, especially for religion. The NPR interview could also be added to the article. St Anselm (talk) 09:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per StAnselm and EricEnfermero. He is a prolific author (WorldCat listing), with works including Christian Religious Education (in 472 libraries), What Makes Us Catholic (in 268 libraries), and Sharing Faith (in 266 libraries). These extensive library holdings strongly imply notability IMO. --Cerebellum (talk) 04:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.