Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThreatModeler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ThreatModeler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. If one does a cleanup of sources there is almost nothing left to consider. Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Computing, Software, and New Jersey. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The cited sources consist largely of press releases and trivial mentions (e.g. quotes from the CEO), and my search found nothing that qualifies as significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and I can't find any, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺21:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator, fails WP:NCORP. Ahmed ^(talk) 15:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.