Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thredded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thredded

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article, written by one of the developers. Indeed, it's one of the few articles they've ever touched in 5 years being on WP. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable and clear COI DeadMansTown (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per DeadMansTown. Sources are also not independent. Liamyangll (talk to me!) 04:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found another article [1] and have added, but nothing else comes up, so IMO there is not enough to meet notability. Zeddedm (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm part of WT:FOSS and this is how it landed on my table. I fully agree with User:onel5969 that we have a case of WP:PROMO here. I suggest deletion and in case it should be of sufficient interest for the FOSS community we might be part of a WP:NEUTRAL rebuild. GavriilaDmitriev (talk) 09:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promtional content present, non-notable sources, lacks notability as per nom. Timetraveller80 (talk) 08:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.