Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three for a Girl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Unambiguous {{nn-band}} case. Never should have been brought here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three for a Girl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A band with only 1 album that has no page either. Wgolf (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:04, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Brand new, unsigned. I'd say it's too soon for them to be on wikipedia. No notability yet. Cpuser20 (talk) 02:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-The article has been around since 2009 so not quite a brand new band-but you are right about notability. Wgolf (talk) 02:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - performing for "nearly a year", but no references.--Rpclod (talk) 04:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.