Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiago Mattos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 20:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tiago Mattos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't even have a single reference covering the biographer in depth. All the references only cite him and some of his projects. Plus, it reads like an advertisement piece. In my point of view, it fails WP:GNG and WP:SOAP. SirEdimon (talk) 02:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the work is not sufficient to meet WP:PROF. DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the nominator that this reads like a paid-for advertising piece, and that the sources don't establish notability per GNG or WP:NPROF. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.