Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ticketgoose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ticketgoose

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement for an Indian company whose local news companies are notorious for republishing their own interviewed company advertisements and quotes, and it shows the fact every single source lists information about their own business plans, thoughts and actions, something only the company would know and, given the circumstances, advertise about it. The history itself shows the account "Satish vp" to be clearly an advertising-only account, therefore we cannot begin to start questioning of making compromises given such blatancy, including when the listed information is only what they would use for advertising, "TicketGoose now covers more than 3000 destinations pan India, aggregate 700+ bus operators with 10,000+ buses plying on 20,000+ routes, and a network of 6000+ on-site agents" (followed by 4 literal press releases). This was accepted 2 years ago but it should not have been given the clear advertising motivations and intentions here, and they have still been continuing (account was last active earlier this year). SwisterTwister talk 19:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as typical "startup spam" on a company with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as business promo. Quis separabit? 14:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fastest growing =/= notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and reads SPAM. Anup [Talk] 00:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Startup spam.Fails Notability criterion.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 18:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable business, one of thousands of non-notable "portals." OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.