Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tickle monster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tickle monster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concept is simple WP:DICDEF. Mentions in published sources appear entirely to be trivial usage by primary sources in a fictional context (notably children's books). Insufficient depth of coverage to pass WP:GNG. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It should definitely be deleted per nom Prince of Thieves (talk) 18:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability. The article has been here since 2013 and has not progressed beyond a definition. Attempts to expand it have never included references to reliable sources. --Northernhenge (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Basically WP:OR. Lacks notability as a fictional character._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.